IVGID’s Financial Meltdown: Part 1
From 2016-2022, IVGID purchased over $53 million of “capital assets”, account 8120. These expenditures, include vehicles, off-road vehicles (snowmobiles, utility carts, etc.), heavy equipment (Caterpillar front-loaders, backhoe, etc.), equipment (golf course mowers, spreaders, forklift, etc) tools (chainsaws, etc) and other items, as infrastructure projects. These expenditures push up rates and fees; the golf courses have millions of dollars of equipment. If Fixed Assets are not properly managed, rates and fees are higher than they should be.
In May, 2023, public records requests were made to examine IVGID’s Fixed Assets List, year ending 2019. In examining the Fixed Asset List[1] of 3958 items, there were multiple issues[2] with vehicles:
1. No mileage or usage hours are included as part of the asset record, even though this is fundamental to determining replacement timing and value on disposition.
2. No condition (excellent, very good, good, fair, poor, etc.) is provided for any asset.
3. No salvage value is set for any asset.
4. For vehicles, the VIN# is often not provided or only a partial VIN of 15 digits was provided. The serial number for equipment maintained by the Fleet Division was often not provided.
5. Assets maintained by the Fleet Division have a TAG Number as part of the description but this is not consistent; there are missing TAG numbers, and some assets with duplicate TAG Numbers: e.g. #542.
6. The Make/Model/Year for vehicles was not recorded consistently in the asset description.
7. There were no details regarding disposal of an asset, including amount obtained; only the date of “disposal” or “retirement”. Often a disposal or retirement date was June 30; it seems a date of convenience for financial statements, rather than an actual disposal date.
In addition, these three anomalies were observed:
1) No mileage logs or usage logs appear to be maintained for any vehicles; although logs were requested, none were provided by IVGID.
2) The 5-year capital plan budgets replacement of assets SOLELY on asset useful life, rather than considering asset condition and use. As IVGID is a seasonal operation, many assets are used about half the time. For example, the golf courses are only open May – October. The ski resort is open for less than five months. Replacing these assets, without considering their condition, means IVGID spends more than they should, and this will only be made worse by recent high inflation. Some vehicles are given to other departments, and new vehicles purchased. No approval by the Board of Directors is made on these transfers. Based on the fuel utilization for some departments, the need for some of these transfers is questionable. The State of Nevada requires justification of 1,100 miles per month for a vehicle. The District might have a lower figure – the point is now there is no justification for transfers among departments or tracking of mileage and usage. The 38 pickup trucks and vans in use at year-end 2019 cost over a million dollars. (graphic right).
3) In the Accounts Payable register, purchases of parts for vehicles, such as tires, do not describe what vehicle the tires are for, and sometimes do not even include the specifications of the tires purchased, e.g. “tires”.
DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
And what about disposal of capital assets?
The current policy (right) states:
5.1 The following procedures should apply to the retirement and disposal of company assets:
• No item of property and equipment should be removed from the premises without a properly approved disposal form
• A disposal form should be completed for all disposals
• This disposal form should be reviewed and approved by the fixed asset accountant
But when we requested disposal forms for the following vehicles, IVGID could not provide any disposal forms.
Here is the excuse “from staff” provided by public records clerk Susan Herron on July 24, 2023:
“So not everything used to get processed through those forms. Staff’s recollection is that the statement was that in the Fixed Asset Set Up form, there is a section for the asset that is being disposed. So that would take care of that disposal. Then the fixed asset inventory which is supposed to be done every 2 years, those disposals didn’t get placed on those sheets for the most part either since that was just a whole other process. To be honest those were barely used since usually a disposals was a direct relation to an addition and so the addition sheet would take care of that.
What kind of logic is this? A approved authorization form (with signature) cannot be replaced by data entry into a computer system. This is an internal control break-down. And the fact that District staff provided the excuse above is a red flag regarding their understanding of internal controls – an indicator that their knowledge is deficient.
We found evidence regarding the following assets that bring up questions about asset disposal.
1) The 2017 Chevrolet Traverse was, per accounting records, taken out of service May 16, 2022. It had been used by the Recreation Center, starting July 12, 2017. It was nearly fully depreciated (5 years, no salvage value was set by IVGID), with $840 remaining. But an on-line search revealed a vehicle with the SAME VIN#[3] and make/model/year was auctioned on Oct 15, 2022 for $10,100. Vehicle mileage listed was 141,293. How in the world had so much mileage been accumulated? Could use for the Seniors Transportation program really generated that much mileage? And where was the vehicle from May, 2022 to October 2022 when it was auctioned? The General Ledger (June 30 2022-May 30, 2023 partial) did not reflect any auction proceeds. This General Ledger was from the MUNIS system, and was $3.9 million out of balance, so more research will need to be done. Conclusions: A vehicle was purchased, its mileage and usage not documented, and then it was disposed with no evidence available showing the District was properly compensated for the asset.
2) A 2006 Club Car Carryall, serial number #RG0645-702795, was taken out of service Oct 6, 2021 per accounting records. It was used by the golf courses. It was fully depreciated (10 years, no salvage value set by IVGID). But an on-line search revealed a sale with the SAME SERIAL# and matching description was auctioned Oct 9, 2021. Hours: 2273 Proceeds: $2,768.50
https://www.motorsportsuniverse.com/listing/auction-results/208830175/club-car-carryall-1-utility-utility-vehicles
The FY2022 General Ledger does not show any auction proceeds for October 2021. Who was paid for the proceeds of the auction? And if it was the District, where were the funds deposited?
The District “disposed” of 7 other Club Car Carryalls. We were unable to find a record of any auctions proceeds being deposited in the General Ledger, or any record of online auctions for the Club Car serial numbers. How were these off-road utility vehicles disposed? Who received them?
Conclusions: Eight utility vehicles, with a market value of over $20,000 appear to have been disposed, but the District did not receive proceeds.
3) A 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 EXTENDED CAB PICKUP 4-DR, operated by an IVGID employee, was “totaled” in an accident according to a General Ledger journal entry. Picture below – note doors.
Although a public records request was made, the District did not provide the accident report. The truck had been used by the Utility Compliance Department. The photo is from the auction provider.
Other photos at: https://en.bidfax.info/chevrolet/silverado/6126289-chevrolet-silverado-ld-k1500-base-ls-2019-white-53l-8-vin-2gcvknec6k1136639.html
No conclusions can be drawn until more evidence is obtained.
CONCLUSIONS
a) Whether IVGID receives value for all assets disposed should be investigated, and not just the 3 specific cases above.
b) The condition and hours of use should be part of the replacement consideration for assets, rather than only using the depreciation construct of “useful life” .
c) Disposal Forms must be completed and signed for ALL fixed assets disposed.
d) Mileage logs must be maintained for all District vehicles.
e) The Fixed Asset Inventory must be reconciled to the assets annually, rather than every two years.
f) Mileage or hours, as appropriate, and condition must be provided by FLEET for all vehicles and rolling stock equipment to Accounting, which must record the mileage, hours, condition on the financial records.
g) Accident reports must be completed and filed with the department in charge of Safety for any accident involving a district vehicle.
h) The DRAFT Accounting Manual currently being reviewed by Moss Adams must be updated with disposal procedures that have controls sufficient to safeguard District Assets.
The author, J. Gumz, is a long-time resident and property owner of Incline Village, and a registered voter.
[1] The 10-page Fixed Asset List that IVGID originally provided was unreadable; the font size was equivalent to microfiche. Providing public records in an unreadable format can be seen as a delay tactic, an obfuscation, or perhaps as concealment.
[2] IVGID has stalled on providing both a Fixed Asset List as of June 30, 2023 and a Fleet Division list of Equipment maintained; the date promised by Susan Herron was August 25, 2023, but this promise was not kept.
[3] VIN is the Vehicle Identification Number of a vehicle and is unique.
Thanks for putting examples to the fears I have had for years given the lack of even a “chart of accounts”. IVGID is so sloppy in record keeping, asset management, disposal, and asset use that it is easy to conclude that management just did not care. Was “management” self dealing, incompetent, or honestly naive? IVGID residents are very fortunate the current board is digging into these clear shortfalls and making an effort to get value out of every dollar given to or spent by IVGID.
Concerned citizens have documented the issues; the Board has fortunately recognized the evidence is real.
I agree with Paul Smith’s comments and observations. Asset Management systems are an integral element of fleet management to include timely equipment retirement considerations. Presumably insurance claims are filed and recovery of asset losses are captured in the financial records / books as well.
Has there ever been a financial audit of IVGID by a CPA firm?
The question should be: has there ever been a forensic audit of IVGID? The answer to that is No.
The annual audit that is performed by a CPA firm relies on management representations, as the letter that accompanies the audit report states. The procedures performed are not an “audit” that would be expected by non-CPAs.
Here is compelling testimony from a lawyer before the SEC, “As we all know, the annual audit does not always uncover questionable financial practices, or ensure that the company’s financial condition is fully and accurately reported. Is it because auditing is a low-margin business that accounting firms use as a way to establish a client relationship? Is it because the audit firms want to stay on good terms with management so they can get those lucrative consulting jobs? People being people, I think we know the answers.”
https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s71300/testimony/eisenho1.htm ”
The answer is likely both.
IVGID has no internal auditor – neither staff nor consultants. Forensic accounting is a specialized field of accounting that involves investigating financial records and transactions to identify potential fraud, misconduct, or other irregularities. It is much more in-depth than an annual financial audit.
Will the Board, immediately, be bringing in a (forensic?) auditing team from a NEW accounting firm (as a reasonable or good accounting firm would have caught this years ago) to deal with any and all of the supervisors in all categories (put them under a microscope)? And when they finish with them I would suggest bringing in a whole new leadership team with one Main Supervisor heading over each Supervisor in each category while also going over All forms with the new accounting firm to bring up to date and then going over all of the forms with main supervisor who will then organize and go over with each new supervisor in each category Exactly how and where and what to do with each piece of equipment, how to handle inventory, etc., with Main supervisor overseeing.
*Note: Obviously there will have to be a beginning inventory handled by Main and new Supervisors.
Thanks. It is a tragedy that IVGID has been so poorly managed. Hopefully an audit will uncover the lack of transparency and absence of best practices. The effluent pipeline is case number 1. What other infrastructure projects should be recognized?
More than “an audit” is needed – a forensic audit involves investigating financial records and transactions to identify potential fraud, misconduct, or other irregularities. The Scope of the forensic audit depends on the engagement letter which is a contract. Determining the scope and priorities is too complex to be discussed in a reply to your comment. Setting the scope is based on risk.
Thanks for the email. It highlighted IVGID lack of best practices and transparency. Hopefully with the current Trustees Dent,Schmitz, and Tulloch along with the audit committee chaired by Chris Nolet we will see corrective actions.
My wife and I are fairly new, Dec 2019, to Incline. Would have never thought a community with highly educated residence and wealth well above the average for NV, could apparently be so poorly run and very little oversight! Do we have staff at IVGID that can reconcile the fixed assets for starters? The Auction yards should have record of who the checks were made out to.
You are right about the auction yards. However, that information is private – obtainable by law enforcement, but not a concerned citizen. IVGID should have provided the public records requested disposal. The fact that they have not is telling.
Regarding whether staff at IVGID can reconcile the fixed assets – there are more issues than contained in this article. A letter was written to the Audit Committee regarding LAND items in the Fixed Asseet list: http://ourivcbvoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/IVGID_AC_letter_Last_assets.pdf The fixed asset ledger appears to have been created when the Financial system “Innoprise” was implemented. BUT – LAND was not correctly cross-checked to the Washoe County Assessor’s list. We have not observed reconciliation skills by any staff of IVGID. And for two years, the bank accounts were not reconciled for a year. So someone at IVGID may have reconciliation skills – but we haven’t seen evidence.
We need to replace all at IVGID. This is travesty that has been
permitted by the voters for much too long. Such ineptness must now continue
It should be relatively easy to find the person responsible or having authority for signing the auction papers, no?
That is not the question – requests for public records go through the public records officer which is currently Susan Herron. As the article explains, public records from the Fleet Division regarding asset disposal were requested – and Ms. Herron promised them no later than August 25, 2023. But these records were not provided. The Fleet Division is fully staffed, as far as we know, and the Department Superintendent is Rich Allen.
The recall effort is trying to get rid of the trustees who have been digging into these financial issues.
SO WHY ARE WE RECALLING THE BEST TRUSTEES because the people are focusing on a promise that was NOT a firm commitment of $25 million that did not happen. Let’s focus on clearing up these financial issues.
Excellent alalysis, thank you for reporting.
This is more than ABSURD…deceit, fraud, stealing come to mind. How in the world can this happen. This is not mismanagement this is INEPTITUDE to the nth degree. We need an Audit of all financial records IMMEDIATELY by a 3rd party/independent group. Is the IVGID Staff and Management inept or simply running a scam???
The question: inept or a scam? – is valid. There have been examples of misuse of public funds – see for a SMALL SAMPLING. http://ourivcbvoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Misuse_public_funds_p1.jpg and http://ourivcbvoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Misuse_public_funds_p2.jpg
A lack of internal controls at IVGID has been documented. This article provides concrete examples. As management has not ensured proper controls as disposal forms are completed and signed – one has to believe management has been part of the problem.
The culture of IVGID believes they operate normally. Their motto states they are “fiscally responsible”. But it would seem that it not true.
The August 28, 2023 Moss Adams report (page 16) states,”When interviewed, the senior management team consistently report that collaboration, internal customer service delivery, and operations are functioning well—indicating that the current structure is generally effective.” https://www.yourtahoeplace.com/uploads/pdf-ivgid/Moss_Adams_Agenda_Item_-_All.pdf Again, this seems to be the opposite of what we found in this slice of IVGID operations.
Can hardly wait for part two.
So now that we know ‘what was’, what is ‘happening now’ – or going forward? I am personally in hopes that things are moving forward in a positive way – immediately!
The recall group turned in the paperwork on Friday Sept 15, 2023 to the Nevada Secretary of State. One or more complaints have been made to the Nevada Secretary of State regarding false statements in the Petitions for Sara Schmitz and/or Matthew Dent. NRS 306.016 states: 4. In addition to any criminal or civil penalty, if the persons filing the notice of intent sign and submit a written declaration pursuant to subsection 2 and the written declaration contains any false statement of material fact, the Secretary of State and county clerks may bring a civil action to recover the actual costs of the signature verification against each person who signed the written declaration, and each person who signed the written declaration is jointly and severally liable for the actual costs of the signature verification.
The Nevada Secretary of State has a backlog in respondng to inquiries made by email of at least two weeks.
Signature verification is now being done by the Secretary of State’s Office. Anyone who signed the petition may remove their name – until the verification process is complete. The verification process is supposedly going to take 30 days – but that could be less. There is no set time in statute.