Does a City of Incline Village make sense?
UPDATE Sept 4, 2023: Local control of short-term rentals (STR) has been cited as one of the reasons for a city. But residents might have the power to take control – through the North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District. The Hawaii Lahaina fire on Maui demonstrates the devastation of fire. The NLTFPD has the ability to set separate ordinances for its boundaries. Pursuant to Article 19, Section 2(3) of the Nevada Constitution, statutory initiative petitions to appear before the 2023 Legislature may be filed on or after January 1, 2022. To qualify for the ballot, petitioners must obtain the signatures of registered voters that equal at least ten percent (10%) of the voters who voted at the last preceding General Election. For the Township of Incline Village, this would be about 901 signatures. So why doesn’t the promoters of the City of Incline Village do this? Or explain – as they have retained multiple lawyers – why this isn’t a good idea? We do not know – but if you like the idea, consider asking them. In August, 2023, a petition was started in neighboring Douglas County to eliminate STRs. Douglas County does not have a separate Fire District for Tahoe, so the petition requires 10% of all Douglas County voters: 4,388 voters.
UPDATE July 9, 2023: If you find this article of interest, please consider forwarding a link to your friends and neighbors. Meanwhile, the City initiative has been “paused”.
UPDATED April 6, 2023: Nevada law, NRS 386, sets the boundary of each school district as the boundary of each COUNTY. So forming a city would have NO EFFECT on schools.
UPDATED June 19, 2023: The organization that is running the city initiative, the Village League to Save Incline Assets, Inc. (a 501c3), arranged a survey using Flashvote. To see the survey results (657 responses), which was open for 48 hours, see this link: survey results.
A new city in Nevada has not been created since Fernley in 2001. Why? Nevada’s laws discourage city incorporation.
1) A new city’s property tax rate is determined after other taxing entities have gotten their share. Imagine a pie worth $3.64; there is a fixed amount to split up. Nevada law caps the total combined property tax rate at $3.64 per $100 assessed value. Incline Village (including Crystal Bay) is at $3.4778 now. [see graphic below] This means, of the pie, the City of Incline might have a maximum of 16 cents ($0.1622) property tax rate.
$3.64 maximum – $3.4778 current Incline rate = $0.1622
For the “average” house in Incline (assessed value $280,000), property taxes would go up about $454, with tax rates going up to the maximum allowed: $3.64. That is only $3.3 million in revenue – not enough money for a new city. But a city has the ability to get other taxes – and they will.
Note: Incline already has two local governments that take 22%: IVGID (Incline Village General Improvement District) and NLTFPD (North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District). A key assumption that has been made about a city is that these two districts would not change – at least initially. None of the other taxing districts: Washoe County, State of Nevada, or the Washoe County School District is going to give up any of their share.
2) A new city would only qualify for “Consolidated tax” (sales tax, property sales transfer tax etc) if it provides police protection and 2 other services from this list: (1) fire protection; (2) construction, maintenance, and repair of roads; or (3) parks and recreation. (City of Fernley v. State, Dept of Taxation).
IVGID and NLTFPD already receive “C-tax” because they were grandfathered when the law was passed in the 1990s. A new city would likely not get much (maybe $139,000) as IVGID and NLTFPD already receive 98% of the average “C-tax” per resident for Washoe County. The amount would come from Washoe County’s portion, and it is unlikely to “share” more.
3) Room taxes are controlled at the County level, not the city. So a city would receive only 7.6% of the revenue, which could range from $250,000 to $600,000 depending on the controls the city imposed on short-term rentals.
4) Business license fees, building permit fees and franchise taxes are important revenue sources for cities. These fees/taxes would have to go up to support the city. Franchise taxes for utilities: internet, cable TV, electricity, and gas mean rates for all these utilities would go up. IVGID already imposes a questionable franchise fee as part of its monopoly contract with Waste Management.
5) Washoe County is highly unlikely to give sufficient funding for Incline Village roads maintenance and police/public safety currently provided by the sheriff’s office. This must be resolved and a number decided because otherwise revenues would be insufficient for a city. But Washoe County does not track expenses by location, so how will these numbers be determined?
In 2010, consultants told the City of Pahrump Incorporation Committee:
“NRS 354. 59875 establishes that, when the county transfers responsibility for services to the city, property tax revenue equivalent to the cost of operating these services within the boundaries of the new city must also transfer.
These cost figures are verified at the time of incorporation by the State’s Committee on Local Government Finance.”
We believe “verification” will consist of Washoe County saying – Yep, this is how much we spend – and the Tax Department (Committee on Local Government Finance) would not say a thing. Our opinion is based on five years of communications with the Tax Department/CLGF by Incline Village residents, including several retired CPAs. The city (meaning the property owners) would be left scrambling to make up the short-fall.
In 2012, the Clark County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously that a proposed incorporated city of Laughlin was not financially feasible. As the Moapa Valley Progress explained,
6) By law, a city has to have certain positions, including a mayor, city council, city attorney, clerk/treasurer, and auditor. A city must also have a municipal court. These positions mean payroll, benefit, and pension costs.
7) A city would have to be part of Nevada’s pension system for employees. Pension costs are a significant expense for government.
8) The city of Fernley had 51 employees in 2012, less than 10 years after it was started. No employees are police as Lyon County provides public safety through the Sheriff’s Office. It has grown to 71 employees (population about 23,000); its Fiscal year 2023 budget was around $14 million. All organizations want to grow, including government. [IVGID had 830 employees in 2021]. Imagine the office space, technology, equipment and other start-up costs required. Remember when the Parasol Foundation wanted to sell its building? Do you think a City of Incline Village would be asked whether it wanted to buy?
In summary, under current Nevada law, it is questionable whether a city of Incline Village is viable. When the Village League to Save Incline Assets, Inc. releases the financial data it is compiling, their figures and assumptions must be carefully examined.
Source: Nevada Department of Taxation, RedBook Fiscal Year 2023
The author is a long-time property owner and resident of Incline Village. J. Gumz attained her CPA in Illinois and testified before the Nevada state legislature in 1995 regarding the financial feasibility of a new County in Nevada.
Thank you for publishing this article, most informative! From a dollars and cents point of view, very doubtful that a ‘City’ structure is possible without at least including (merging?) IVGID into the City structure – the ‘Beaches’ apparently would remain an IVGID sole responsibility due to the deed restriction. All other services (water, sewer, parks and services to include recreation, etc.) should move out of the IVGID domain into the City structure and under the City’s management and fiscal responsibility.
The transition to a city will be large. Office space, all types of equipment, software systems, and the tough one would be employees. It would be good to know the number of employees which would be needed. If the buzz around town is there is no housing then keeping employees for long periods becomes difficult. The formation advocates should provide citizens with a reasonable plan for intended capital projects to enhance the new city. Lots of work here.
I agree with this assessment, only because it matches with my gut feel and exposure to small city management as an observer. It’s very expensive AND expansive. That’s just the nature of the beast. Needless to say, I am opposed.
The League did yeoman’s work on tax refunds and i supported them financially, but this is a bridge too far and a bad idea.
So what are the proponents of an IV “city” saying?
The web site for the initiative is cityofinclinevillage dot com
There is a FAQ page.
But if you read it, you will see the level of detail in this article is greater than the FAQ.
When might their financial estimates regarding revenue and expenses be available?
Todd L. mentioned December in the Sept 27th meeting – with multiple scenarios said to be likely.
Got it. Thx
All the above AND who will govern? Our Board of Trustees? Aargh…right now they can’t seem to handle what is on their plate let alone run a city.
Yeah, the ‘big $’ is in being a County.
Imagine “Lake County” to unify all basin communities who share common ground and concerns unique to being in the basin vs. the rest of the county district that is not lakeside.
Congress created the TRPA to uphold 9 Thresholds designed to protect Lake clarity and National Treasure enjoyment.
What if we go back to Congress and exchange the ‘Fed Compact’ for a ‘County Compact’ where we govern as one Lake County whose highest purpose is actually aligned with the Lake that our common; ecology, wildlife, personal and collective economy is dependent on?
…with more funding to solve problems in our front and backyard, vs. being governed by those who don’t always live here and have to accommodate a much larger region with competing needs that prevent the very compliance required to protect the unique aspects of the Lake and land surrounding it?
I can hear your ‘that’ll never happen’ response.
I wonder if the Bi-State Compact idea was considered crazy impossible too.
Reality emerges from the stories we create and when reality isn’t working…its time for a new Story.
(a ‘National Treasure’ on a world stage that exports inspiration…has a lot of fans)
As the anonymous Incline Villager quote says, “Only those who see the invisible can do the impossible”
(it was on a poster in the old Bonanza museum when it was housed in the Starbucks building).
just sayin
Current Nevada law divides Consolidated tax revenue (sales tax, real estate sales tax, etc) among the 17 counties. An 18th county is not feasible
unless this law is changed, because no one would want to give up part of their revenue to a new county.
In 2021, Blockchains LLC in Storey County withdrew its controversial request to effectively create a new county (Innovations Zones) in Northern Nevada. Although billionaire CEO Jeffrey Berns made political donations, he could not get traction.
I understand and that is why I brought up exchanging the bi-state compact.
I don’t know other place in our country where a national treasure in the form of a lake motivated the creation of a special entity to manage the land around the water
The proposed county (which would actually be called Tahoe County not Lake county that one’s already taken in California)…would be a very unique situation and maybe counties the wrong word
Maybe there is a way to reorg the Compact to override county state city regulations?
As a Fed sanctioned entity it should but we in Incline know it doesn’t and this can inhibit protecting our national treasure
the advantage ( as you pointed out) county structure is the TOT money !! Probably over $100M annual from around lake
More than enough money generated from hospitality to serve transit, education, workforce and needs of the visitors and National Treasure
maybe I don’t have the exact words but a structure to move us forward in order to protect our National Treasure is best
From article, Fernley population is ~23,000, has 71 employees.
IV+CB population is less than 10,000 has 830 employees.
To what specific responsibilities are the 830 IVGID employees allocated?
“Specific Responsibilities” would be in the job description. For the 830 employees, there were 202 job descriptions. IVGID has these records.
A simpler approach would be to look at JOB TITLES. You can see the IVGID annual payroll using this link.
Select the button “2021” which will display BEACHES, GOLF, Community Services etc. You can CLICK to drill down and see individual employees and their job title.
https://projectauditors.com/Private/iv-app/public/find-fund-emp.php
Thank you! Finally some real facts and the truth. Proponents don’t want to hear this, but our real problem is IVGID. As long as it continues, a new city will never realize any portion of the ad valorem or consolidated taxes IVGID currently receives. Just like the City of Fernley, a new city will receive no consolidated taxes. And given the maximum statewide tax rate, there is essentially nothing left over for a new city to levy as an ad valorem tax (moreover, can you imagine three different ad valorem taxes plus two Recreation/Beach Facility Fees? That’s right! The county, IVGID and the new city). Nor will a new city ever realize any portion of the 10% trash franchise W-M currently passes through to IVGID. Therefore in order to free up possible revenue sources for a new city, IVGID must be dissolved. Plus dissolution gives us the opportunity to fix something which has been broken since creation. But the proponents of incorporation adamantly refuse to touch IVGID. This is because they are working in kahoots with IVGID staff, and they fear our beaches will become public (how can the beaches be owned by a public agency, and yet access be denied to its residents/taxpayers?). Thus incorporation with IVGID remaining is nothing more than a pipedream, and a very stupid idea.